SF Politics and HousingPosted by Robert at 01 Jun 2008 02:44 am
Does anyone have a copy of the mailer that the No on F people did? It has a photo-shopped picture of Chris Daly looking like a thug on one side and God and his angels on the other side suggesting that voters vote Yes on G.
Here is a response take-off picture.
June 1st, 2008 at 3:58 pm
Goes to show you the kind of people we are dealing with. Hopefully, voters are smart enough to see through this shit. I am dying of curiousity to see this picture. Please post it if you find it.
You know what would be interesting? We could set up a huge Wall of Shame in Chris’ office showing all the hit-pieces, ad hominem campaign literature and other ruthless crap that Chris has had to deal with ever since his first campaign for Supervisor. It could serve as a badge of honor for how he is doing all the right things. I mean, it really is all about his ideology, not his character. His behavior is just their convenient excuse. If he were a conservative like Gavin Newsom, they would say that his antics were adorable and the Chronicle would affectionately say that he was a young John Burton with a promising future.
June 1st, 2008 at 8:42 pm
Daly is also mentioned numerously in the official voter’s handbook in the No on F pages.
The paid consultants know that Daly is a liability to any cause he supports. You remember that Proposition E a year ago (the one that would have forced Newsom to speak to the Board of Supervisors monthly) was the only progressive measure that did not pass in that election. This is because Daly’s negatives far outweigh his positives to the electorate body in general.
In future, progressives should make sure that Daly is not the front man on any issue. Let him do his good work from behind the scenes.
June 2nd, 2008 at 10:37 pm
Which side are you on?
Why choose sides. Both props F and G are crappy attempts at ballot box planning…