Make mine Linux
There's an interesting article in Seattle's Alt Weekly The Stranger this week about Microsoft caving in to fundamentalist pressure on a gay rights bill in Washington State.
At the April 4 meeting, [Microsoft general counsel Bradford L.] Smith told members of GLEAM, the gay and lesbian employees group at Microsoft, that the company had switched its official stance to "neutral" on the bill, and took personal responsibility for the decision. He characterized the shift as part of a broader general review of company policy designed to more precisely formulate criteria for determining when Microsoft should involve itself in "social issues," but also disclosed the pressure that had been brought to bear on him by Hutcherson.Ironically, Microsoft is apparently a pretty good place for LGB employees to work (don't know about the T employees). There is some speculation that Microsoft has its metaphorical finger to the wind, and has decided that it's blowing from the past.
As for Murray, he believes the company was faced with a "profound" moral test, which it failed. The backpedaling "sends an incredible message of weakness and shows a lack of moral backbone," he says. "I mean, what is this? Is this the 1930s, and are they Krups?"We hear a lot these days about the new-fangled Democrats coming out of the Tech Industry (Chris Nolan calls them "Progressive Libertarians", others call them the "New Democrats"), and if this is an example of what we can expect from them, then we're going to need to look elsewhere.


2 Comments:
One of the strangest things about this entire Microsoft thing is that (according to several articles) the pressure to withdraw support came not from, as might be expected, the national wingnuts - but from a local (in or near Redmond) evangelical church. I would think that Microsoft operated on a much higher level than a threat from a local church . . .
As for the tech industry progressives, I think Chris's analysis is spot on - they're more progressive libertarians than New Dems. There are a few of us who are dyed in the wool democrats - but most are more in along the lines of "stay the hell out of my business" libertarians. If the GOP ever stops sticking their head in through everyone's bedroom window, they'll go back to happily playing ultima, and harassing the CoS on usenet.
if what you say it true: "If the GOP ever stops sticking their head in through everyone's bedroom window, they'll go back to happily playing ultima", then how are these folks "progressive"? I mean, if a "progressive" Libertarian is just a Libertarian who buys sex toys, then for the rest of us, there's not a lot of difference...
Post a Comment
<< Home